I
was raised a Missouri Synod Lutheran. Some of my earliest memories involve a
Sunday School class at church, a small room (it was a small, new church) with
jalousied windows. Our teacher was Miss Gail. Whether accurate or not, the
memory that stands out is coloring scenes from Bible stories.
In
seventh and eighth grades, it was catechism class, every Tuesday and Thursday after
school. We were taught from Martin Luther’s
small catechism. The worship service included communion, a reading from a
Gospel and an epistle, hymns and a sermon. To this day there are certain hymns
that I always think of as “Lutheran hymns,” because I sang them many, many
times over the years at our church. Luther wrote a lot of them.
One
might say that by the time I enrolled in college, I had been thoroughly “Lutheranized.”
But it was during my freshman year that I discovered another Luther, one I had
never heard about.
I
should say up front that this was not the typical “Christian goes to college
and falls under the influence of evil, pagan professors” story. I was in a
small colloquium, mostly about history, literature and culture, and the
professor assigned us a paper on the Reformation – specific topic of our choice.
I decided to do some reading about Luther, and tripped over the Peasants Revolt
of the 1524-1525. Peasants all over the German states and beyond, influenced by
the overthrow of the Catholic Church in their areas, decided to attack another
source of tyranny – the landowners and the nobles. At first, the revolt has
been relatively mild, and Martin Luther openly supported it. Then it spread and
turned more violent.
And
Martin Luther, the Martin Luther who wrote the hymns I sang and the catechism I
had studied, turned against the revolt and began preaching sermons with themes
like “destroy the peasant vermin.” (The nobles obliged.) I also discovered he
could use rather earthy language, something else we never heard in catechism
class. I wrote a paper filled with youthful indignation. My professor told me I
was being too hard on Luther.
One
thing I didn’t understand was what Luther’s nailing of the 95 theses on the
Wittenburg church door had triggered. It wasn’t only what would be decades of
religious wars and turmoil. Whether cause or catalyst, Luther helped blow up
how people understood the world. And it didn’t take long for Luther himself to challenged
and “broken away from.” Groups and sects appeared all over Europe. Some of
them, as Judith Shulevitz points out in The
Sabbath World: Glimpses of a Different Order of Time, had very different notions
about what constituted the Sabbath, what day it should be observed, and how it
should be observed. (Luther got involved in this, too. Luther seems to have
gotten himself involved in everything.)
In two chapters, “People of the Book”
and “Scenes of Instruction,” Shulevitz recounts how the understanding of the
Sabbath began to change and reshape itself in the 16th century, the
Puritans in the 17th century (and it’s not what you might expect it
to be), Rousseau and the Romantic poets in the late 18th and early 19th
centuries, the contribution made by Charles Dickens (who urged everyone to get
physical exercise on Sundays), and on to writers like George Eliot and D.H.
Lawrence. The 19th century saw something of a counter-reaction to
the Rousseaus and the poets, largely under the influence of the evangelical
movement, and the explosion of Sunday Schools (and how some of those evolved to
non-religious activities).
It’s a fascinating account, but its
importance is more than just satisfying intellectual curiosity. How we
understand the Sabbath also relates to how we understand God. Seeing how the
Sabbath has been influenced by culture also points to understanding our beliefs
about faith and god have been influenced by culture.
I’m a Presbyterian today, and no
longer casting aspersions on Luther’s character for urging the extermination of
rebellious peasants. I believe I understand what was actually happening, and have
set my youthful outrage to the side.
But then Shulevitz says John Calvin,
the patron saint of Presbyterianism, had people burned at the stake in Geneva. Wait!
Stop! Only the Catholics did that, and in Spain. You know, Cervantes and Don
Quixote and the Inquisition and auto da fe and all that. Certainly the
Presbyterians didn’t do that. Not John Calvin! Arrgghhhh!
We’re reading The Sabbath World
over at The High Calling. To see
the discussion about this week’s chapters, please visit the site (and don’t tell them
about Calvin).
Of course, Martin Luther also turned on the Jews after first attempting to convert them, penning a book "Of the Jews and their Lies." Oh, well, it's not the first of such polemics in history, but one does not expect them of such a seminal figure as Luther. Well, I'll bet if Luther were alive today, being a reformer, he'd probably be a Jon Stewart fan.
ReplyDeletei'm glad to hear that the youthful outrage is having its rest.
ReplyDeleteI remember how disillusioned I was when I first learned that about Calvin...
ReplyDeleteWasn't this an interesting part of the reading, Glynn? I love how you draw us to the bottom line: culture matters. Yes, the way we see Sabbath affects the way we see God.
Good thoughts, Glynn.
Isn't it wonderful that God uses imperfect people. It's funny how we can idolize someone until we see some of their "humanness". The Bible is full of "humans".
ReplyDeleteDavid is called a man after God's own heart and yet he was a horrible father, committed adultery and had someone murdered.
Nope, none of us are perfect, but God loves us anyway. So thankful for Grace! John 3:16-17
Found my way here from Rick at planned peasant-hood
Here from the latest link up -- and I am sad I hadn't found the read along last year! I am going to check out the book. I have a soft spot for Luther -- I mean, his snark is out of this world in the 93 Theses (or how ever many there are. Ahem.)
ReplyDeleteMy 'first' time reading this. I liked your ending about John Calvin. Nooooo.... I guess our heroes are/were all human.
ReplyDelete