I
read what I thought was an essay in a high school literature class: “The Idea of the University” (1852)
by John Henry Cardinal Newman. It was something that, at one time, high school
seniors read in literature class, and might show more than casual interest in because
college was imminent, at least for many of them.
It
turned out that what we were reading was only an excerpt; the work is a
full-length book. For a long time, possibly until the time of
post-modernism in literature, Newman’s work had great influence on our
collective understanding of what a university was supposed to be. (It also took
me a while to realize that the Newman Center
at my university, LSU, took its name from the Cardinal, as did the Newman
Centers at universities across the United States, from the man who wrote The Idea of a University.) (I was raised
Protestant, so I had a slight excuse for my ignorance.)
At
the heart of the work was that the purpose of the university was intellectual
and pedagogical, not religious or moral. And he believed that the discussion of
controversial topics was important in discerning truth. (And this, of course,
would set the stage for conflict with church authorities.)
What
I did not know much about was who Cardinal Newman (1801-1890) was. And then, in
the shop at Westminster Cathedral (not the Abbey) in London, I saw a paperback copy
of John
Henry Newman: A Mind Alive by Roderick Strange. Home it came to St.
Louis.
The
work is both an intellectual biography of Newman as well as something of a
memoir by Strange, rector of the Pontifical
Beda College at the Vatican. Strange describes how he came to discover and
study Newman, and how the works of the cardinal became a lifelong interest and
passion.
Newman
didn’t start out as a Catholic. He was originally Church of England, and an
ordained C of E priest. He was assigned to a post at Oxford University, and
there became interested in Catholicism. He became known as a leader of the
Oxford Movement, which aimed to return the Church of England to its Catholic
roots. He eventually left the church, embraced Catholicism, and became a
Catholic priest.
For
many years, life in the Catholic Church did not go smoothly for Newman. The man
had a brilliant, inquisitive, almost restless mind. He questioned. Occasionally
he was suspected of heresy. He resigned (out of frustration) as the rector of
Catholic University of Ireland. In 1859, he was named editor of the Catholic
newspaper The Rambler, replacing someone considered a bit too liberal. He wrote
and published an article that suggested that there were times and circumstances
when the laity should be consulted in matters of doctrine. The article was not
well received by the priests and bishops, and he resigned a few months later.
For
years he worked under something of a cloud, serving the church at the Birmingham
oratory. In 1864, he published Apologia
Pro Vita Sua, another milestone in English literature and one in which
he defended his religious beliefs. And
then, in 1879, Pope Leo XIII elevated Newman to the status of cardinal.
Strange
focuses on Newman’s thinking and writings, placing them in the context of both
England and the Catholic Church in the 19th century (it’s helpful to
remember that Catholics in England were only granted full citizenship rights in
the 1829, when Newman was 28, even though he was still Church of England at this time). And he approaches his subject much as Newman
himself would have done, with a question if reverent perspective.
The
book also taught me something else I didn’t know – Newman was a poet. One of
his better known poems is “The Dream
of Gerontius,” but he wrote a number of other religious poems
as well.
A Mind Alive is a solid
introduction to Newman’s thinking.
Photograph: The Birmingham Oratory in
England, where Newman served for many years. Birmingham is also Newman’s
birthplace.
I have to admit to ignorance: This is the first time I know of Newman or this book.
ReplyDeleteInteresting. I can now add John Henry Newman to my collection of writers who converted to Catholicism. Others include G.K. Chesterton, Graham Greene, and T.S. Eliot.I will definitely want to look into his writings. I am a former Catholic who is exploring the idea of going back. I like your blog!
ReplyDelete