Last
fall, we had the opportunity to see an exhibition of paintings by J.M.W. Turner
(1775-1851), considered one of the best English painters ever. The exhibition, “Late
Turner: Painting Set Free,” was at the Tate Britain, which has a rather
large collection of Turner paintings – the result of a bequest by Turner to the
British nation. From London, the exhibition traveled to the Getty Museum
in Los Angeles and the deYoung Museum
in San Francisco.
We
wandered through the exhibition galleries, still fighting off jet lag and not
helped one bit by the rather low lighting. The paintings were from Turner’s
final years, covering roughly 1835 to his death in 1851. What struck me was how
contemporary many of the paintings seemed, and one could even view some of the
paintings as anticipating Impressionism.
Except
they don’t. In the book that accompanied the exhibition, J.M.W.
Turner: Painting Set Free, the editors and authors argue for
understanding Turner in his own time, his final years coinciding with the early
years of the Victorian period. His paintings addressed the audience of his
time.
Turner in middle age |
Evidence
for that, for example, is the painting pictured at top. Entitled “The Fighting
Temeraire,” it was painted in 1839 and depicts the retirement of a magnificent
sailing ship, being led to its place in the scrap yard. The age of sail was
passing; the age of steam had arrived. And no painting captured the transition
better than “The Fighting Temeraire,” one of Turner’s most popular works. The audience
of 1839 understood exactly the point Turner was making int hat painting, whereas
today, without any of the background, we might simply see a sailing ship being
moved by a tug boat.
The
book, edited by David Blayney Brown, Amy Concannon and Sam Smiles, is filled
with information like that. And it’s information in a readable, accessible
style, and not what one might expect from an exhibition book. It’s divided into
two sections: five relatively short essays covering large topics, and the
exhibition catalogue, divided into seven sections covering the paintings,
watercolors and other items in the exhibition.
The
five general essays cover Turner in his own time and later; the final years of
his life; an interpretation of what was happening in his later works; the
watercolors he produced during the last years of his life; and his materials
and technique.
The Blue Rigi, Sunrise (1842) |
At
the Tate exhibition, I enjoyed the watercolors as much as the oil paintings. In
fact, the work I kept coming back to was a watercolor, “The Blue Rigi,” a
mountain on Lake Geneva (and I’ve posted it several times here; I like it so
much I’m posting it again).
The
catalog section of the book provides extensive information on each work in the
exhibition, and it was only reading the book that I discovered that quite a few
of the works shown at the Tate in London did not travel to the exhibitions in
California.
J.M.W.
Turner: Painting Set Free is a fine work, filled with information about and
understanding of the artist, and a book that easily stands on its own. Recently
rereading it, however, did take me back a year to that exhibition at the Tate.
Related:
My
post on Turner the movie: http://faithfictionfriends.blogspot.com/2015/01/mr-turner-movie-thats-painting.html
My
review of Peter Ackroyd’s biography of Turner: http://faithfictionfriends.blogspot.com/2012/12/peter-ackroyds-turner.html
My
review of James Wilson’s The Dark Clue, a mystery based on the life of Turner http://faithfictionfriends.blogspot.com/2014/10/james-wilsons-dark-clue.html
If
you’re interested in Turner, his paintings, and particularly his later years,
the movie Mr. Turner was released in
2014, with actor Timothy Spall wonderfully playing the title character.
I love Turner's work. Thank you for this reminder; I want to go find that film!
ReplyDeleteInteresting read, I do agree with you that he was certainly anticipating impressionist. I could point out, however, that the image you have used is not Turner's work but a rather poor copy made in a much less impressionist style. For me it certainly lacks the impact that Turner's original has.
ReplyDelete