I have to admit
that my knowledge of King John (1167-1219, ruled 1199-1216) came primarily from
two sources – my vague recollection of what happened at Runnymede with the signing
of the Magna Carta, the 1968 film “The Lion in Winter,” and the
Walt Disney 1973 children’s film “Robin
Hood.”
Then I read King
John: Treachery and Tyranny in Medieval England by British historian Marc Morris. It turns out my
recollections were indeed vague, and mostly wrong, and certain elements of the
King John character in the 1968 movie and the Disney animated film were
accurate.
John was the
youngest son of Henry II and Eleanor of Aquitaine. This was medieval Europe,
and kings and queens and their children were almost by definition pawns on a
continent-wide chessboard. All of John’s older brothers (included Richard the
Lionhearted) died before him, and he became king almost my default. Richard
reportedly favored a nephew, named Arthur, as his successor. The French king
Philip Augustus also favored Arthur. John eventually had Arthur killed.
John had a lot
of people killed. And imprisoned. He made grants of landed, cities, castles,
and estates, and often revoked them. He seemed to have been forever at battle –
with the French, with his brothers (he plotted against Richard), with his own
earls and barons, with relatives, and often with allies (allegiances in this
period were extremely fluid).
Based on
meticulous and in-depth research, especially from contemporary sources, Morris
draws a detailed picture of King John and his times that is complex, nuanced,
and highly readable. (The British seem to excel at the writing of history,
especially the “highly readable” part.) John’s fortunes ebbed and flowed; he
gained all of his family’s territory in France and lost it, and often regained
part of it back. He battled the king of Scotland and some of his own nobles in
Wales, Ireland, and England. He relied upon mercenaries to an extraordinary
degree. He argued almost continually with the pope, until he adroitly turned
the tables on everyone and made the pope one of his chief defenders.
Marc Morris |
The story of
King John is a surprising one. Morris is more than fair in his assessment of
the ruler and the man; John did many things that rightfully earned his
tyrannical reputation. But one thing he wasn’t – he was not a weak, indecisive
ruler who gave up his kingly rights at Runnymede. In fact, within two weeks of
signing what came to be known as the Magna Carta, John was already plotting and
preparing to renew his battle with the barons.
Morris is the author
of A
Great and Terrible King: Richard I and the Forging of Britain (2008);
The
Norman Conquest (2013); and several other books on medieval British
history. His doctorate on the 13th century earls of Norfolk was
published in 2005. He lives in England, and is a lecturer, broadcaster, and
academic castle tour guide. He presented the television program “Castle” and
wrote the accompanying book.
King John is a
history that is both absorbing and entertaining, reflected solid research and a
deep understanding of whom this man was, what he did, and how he accomplished
what he did in vary trying, dangerous times.
Illustration: An illuminated painting of
King John on a stag hunt, scanned from the book The National Portrait Gallery History of
the Kings and Queens of England by David
Williamson, ISBN 1855142287., Public Domain, via Wikipedia.
I read and enjoyed Morris's biography of Edward I. I'll have to read this one next.
ReplyDelete