For
decades, management was considered a business “science,” a discipline that
could be taught in business school classrooms and applied in the workplace. One
of the primary exponents of management as science was Peter Drucker, who wrote
numerous books on the subject including the business classic Management.
Drucker’s writings tracked the rise of the 20th century industrial
order, and management was the pinnacle of that.
Management
is still taught in business schools, but the order began to fray and unravel in
the 1970s and 1980s. Inflation (the prime rate hit 20 percent at one point) and
OPEC took a huge toll on the industrial order in the 1970s, and helped led to
the convolution of acquisitions, divestitures, restructurings, and downsizings
of the 1980s and 1990s. Overlay that with the electronic communications revolution
of the 1990s and 2000s, and management as a “science” seemed rather faded and
shallow in the face of so much turmoil and change.
What
emerged from the turmoil as the operational principle for the workplace was the
idea of leadership. The difficult is that leadership can’t really be taught in
the classroom. It can be studied, yes. But leadership depends on the character
and abilities of the individual, applied in the right way at the right time. Leadership
is less a science and more an art. You can teach principles of art, and how art
has developed over the centuries, but you can’t really teach an artist the
desire and passion to paint, or sculpt, or write.
One
the best discussions I’ve read on how leadership functions in the workplace is Make
a Difference: Growth in Leadership by Dr. Larry Little (with co-authors
Melissa Hambrick Jackson and David Rupert). As the book demonstrates,
leadership is easy to understand – we know it when we see it or experience it –
but is not so easy to actually do.
Little
divides his description of leadership into six components – gratitude,
responsibility, ownership, willingness, tough calls, and health. The discussion
of each if structured by interviews with leaders at all levels and from all walks
of life, people who are leading in their own organizations and circumstances.
What emerges from this discussion is an understanding of leadership as
something very real and immediate, and something that likely exists within each
of us.
Leaders
know how to give genuine praise – and why it matters.
Leaders
take responsibility and are accountable; they know how to translate vision into
reality, and then know that it happens through people.
Leaders
are servants, and may follow as much as they lead.
Leaders
make the tough calls, but they put others’ interests first.
And
leaders know how to maintain their own and their organization’s “leadership
health.”
The
principles follow from having a broad array of people tell their leadership
stories. The principles seem simple, and they are, but simple does not mean
easy. Leadership is hard work. It’s also incredibly rewarding work.
And,
as Make a Difference: Growth in
Leadership demonstrates, as rare as it may be, it can happen anywhere.
2 comments:
Glynn, thank you for honoring our words with your review.
Thanks for a good review Glynn. I have this in my Amazon bookbag just waiting for one or two more items. Makes me desire to read it even more.
Post a Comment