I’ve
been reading a history of the Tudors, covering four rulers of England – Henry VIII, the
boy-king Edward VI,
Mary, and Elizabeth I.
Sixteenth-century England, particularly from about 1520 to 1558, when Elizabeth
became queen, was a time and place of social, religious and economic upheavals
that left their mark on England and Britain, and even upon what became the
English colonies in North America.
The
religious upheaval was likely the most profound and far-reaching. When Henry
VIII became king in 1509, all seemed right with the English world. Its
landscape was dotted with hundreds of abbeys, cathedrals, monasteries,
convents, and friaries. At one point, the Pope named Henry the “Defender of the
Faith” (a title still used by British sovereigns). No one could imagine the
convulsion that England was going to experience, largely but not totally caused
by the inability of Henry and his wife Katherine of Aragon to produce a male
heir.
But
the convulsion came. Henry broke with Rome but not as completely as we might
think. At one point in the English Reformation,
a conservative reaction set it, and Henry pulled in the reins. But overall, by
the time of Henry’s death in 1547, English Catholicism was largely in physical
and financial ruin. Some of the worst depredations included the destruction of
the shrines of Edward
the Confessor at Westminster Abbey and Thomas Beckett at
Canterbury Cathedral.
During
the short reign (1547 – 1553) of Henry’s son, Edward, the Archbishop of
Canterbury, Thomas
Cranmer, published a new order of religious worship, what today we call The Book of Common
Prayer. It caused a rebellion by the common people, especially those
who lived in rural areas, who demanded a return to the “old religion.” Yes, the
revolt was put down. It was one of numerous revolts that happened all through
this period. Upheaval must have seemed almost commonplace.
It’s
what can happen when a society becomes unhinged from its most basic
foundations.
At
First Things, editor R.R. Reno recently posted a short article about T.S.
Eliot and the idea of liberalism. Eliot, in his Idea of a Christian Society, discussed liberalism as a foundational
principle for any society. Liberalism champions freedom, especially individual
freedom, but that it also something of a fatal flaw. Individual freedom
invariably leads to individual excess, and liberalism is forced to turn to a stronger
and stronger central government to maintain order. It is one reason, Reno says
for example, why universities are increasingly in the business of speech codes,
censorship, the stifling of free speech, and ever more stringent regulations on
sexual relations.
The
people who lived through the Tudor era may have something to teach us. The Book
of Common Prayer wasn’t the cause of societal upheaval, but it did provide a
spark. Conditions were already worsening; things were breaking down, from law
and order to growing economic inequality.
When
we unhinge ourselves from the principles and ideas and guide society – like Christianity
– upheaval and chaos can often be the result. And the only remedy for upheaval
and chaos is a strong, authoritarian government that will, inevitably, reduce
individual freedoms.
Related: The Book of Common Poetry.
No comments:
Post a Comment