Thirty
years ago, I felt a need to study church history. What I knew was largely
confined to the New Testament and basic facts from general history courses.
My
primary sources of reading (remember this was pre-internet) was the monthly
catalog from Christian Book
Distributors
(CBD), Christian bookstores (which didn’t carry much on history), and used
bookstores. In the mid-1980s, as part of a masters program at Washington
University in St. Louis, I took several seminars related to church history –
“Athens and Jerusalem,” “The Idea of Rome,” and even “The History of the Early
Christian Church.”
That
masters program brought me to the university’s library. The collection on the
church and Christianity was large – and largely unused. I had virtually no
competition for books.
I
read some wonderful books. The works of the 19th century historian
Sir William Ramsay were reprinted in the early 1970s, and CBD had them
available for a steep discount. Ramsay, an atheist, traveled to New Testament
lands to disprove the truth of Christianity, and became a convinced Christian. His
writings include The Church in the Roman
Empire, The Cities of St. Paul,
and The Letters to the Seven Churches.
My
course work at Washington University introduced me to the writings of the early
church fathers, like Iraneus and especially Tertullian, the Roman lawyer turned
Christian apologist who became a kind of heretic, although the exact nature of
his heresy is not known today. Even in English translation, to read Tertullian
is to read the passion of a razor-sharp mind. For one of the courses, I read Peter
Brown’s Augustine of Hippo, one of my
all-time favorite books.
At
used bookstores, I found titles like Scenes
from the Life of St. Paul by J.S. Howson (1909) and The Life and Letters of St. Paul (1928).
Other
books I read along the way include The
History of Christianity by Kenneth Scott Latourette, The Rise of Christianity by W.H.C. Frend, and New Testament History by F.F. Bruce (anything by F.F. Bruce is
good).
Recently,
I began to revisit some of the books I’ve read and find some new ones. Tomorrow
I’ll be posting a review of Ben Witherington’s A Week in the Life of Corinth, and I’m
currently reading a 2012 revised edition of The Apostle: A Life of St. Paul by John
Pollock, first published in 1969.
Why
do I read church history?
It’s
interesting. I find it fascinating.
It’s
important. You learn things about the church that you don’t find in general
history books, like the role of the church in the anti-slavery movement (and
the role of the church in trying to maintain slavery in the U.S. South), how
the church likely saved Western civilization after the collapse of Rome, and
(more recently) the role of the church in the collapse of communism in Eastern
Europe. Not to mention that modern capitalism was one of the results of the
Protestant Reformation.
Church
history also provides perspective. The church didn’t leapfrog from the Book of
Acts, make a brief stop at the Reformation and then appear again with the rise
of mega-churches in the United States in the 1980s. For 2,000 years, Christians
have struggled and fought and lost and won and prevailed and retreated. Culture
wars existed before.
What
studying church history also creates is a humbling and deep sense of gratitude
for the Christians who walked before us and what they, with God’s grace, made
possible.
Photograph by Petr Kratochvil via Public
Domain Pictures. Used with permission.
3 comments:
Thanks for this important word about getting to know our family in Christ. I'm also glad you're part of our Christian Poets & Writers family on Facebook :)
Glynn ... though not a history in the classic sense, I would recommend Missionary Methods, St.Paul's or Ours by Roland Allen. Written in early 20th Century, it is a good historical analysis of the first century church movement. Grace to you today. Thanks for posting.
a good post...
i read it all. and there is one word that caught my attention.
"virtually."
it goes in okay, but, gets mucked up somewhere in process and comes out all wrinkled and beat up and unrecognizable.
especially when taken with such words as "library" and "books."
way off the subject...i know.
Post a Comment