It’s
easy, perhaps too easy, to think of work as a curse. We all have days (weeks /
months) when our work seems like a curse. When I’m in the middle of yet another
online crisis at work, the internet seems to be blowing up on and it seems to
be all aimed at my organization, and my boss sends an email questioning why I
used a particular word in a Facebook comment, yes, work can seem like a curse.
What
came first, work or the curse?
The
image that immediately comes to mind: Adam and Eve have been caught eating of
the tree of knowledge. God is not pleased. Adam is told that he will now work
by the sweat of his brow. Eve is told about the pain of childbirth (another
kind of work).
Work
is a curse, right?
Actually,
the answer is no. In the Bible, work came before the curse. The first work
recorded in the Bible was the work of creation, God’s work of creation. “God
saw all he had made, and it was very good.” Adam and Eve lived in the garden
and their work was to take care of it.
Work
was a good thing.
Work
is still a good thing.
But
it’s humanity – we humans – who continually screw it up. In Slow Church:
Cultivating Community in the Patient Way of Jesus, Christopher
Smith, John Pattison, and Jonathan Wilson-Hartgrove speak to the productive and
protective elements of work, and they speak to where we usually get it wrong.
They point to Adam Smith (1723-1790), the “patron
saint of capitalism.” Smith didn’t look at work for its inherent dignity, they
say, but only for its usefulness. “The purpose of work is production, and the
sole purpose of all production, said Smith, is consumption…Thus, work is a
means to an end.”
The dignity of work disappears. The inherent
value of work itself disappears. Work is only important for providing us money
to buy stuff and pay for services.
It’s Smith and the Industrial Revolution that
gives us what we know today as the pervasive division of labor. We do different
things to enhance production. This is so common to us today that we don’t
realize how radical it was in the 18th century.
Increased production and improved manufacturing
comes at a price, and the price includes alienation.
Smith wasn’t alone. Later, Frederick Taylor (1856-1915)
came along to subdivide work into minute components, with even more alienation
and fragmentation. The authors of Slow Church point out that Taylor’s The Principles of Scientific Management (1911)
was the first business bestseller. It especially found a welcoming audience
with – surprise! – Vladimir Lenin in Russia.
Today, Slow
Church argues, we have McDonaldization, how we are to act and move in every
situation. This has extended beyond the workplace to the home and to the
church. (I can personally attest to the impact that business and business
executive thinking has had on two different churches we attended in St. Louis.)
(It was not a good thing.)
Should there be an alternative? And is the
church the institution to point the way to an alternative?
We’ll consider those questions next week.
I’ve been discussing Slow Church for the past several Mondays. Today’s discussion is the
first of two parts on the chapter entitled “Work.” I’ll conclude the discussion
of the chapter next Monday.
Related: Jim Wood at The High Calling’s Mission / Work channel at
Patheos has a similar discussion, Is
Work a Curse or Inherently Good?
Photograph
by Ian L via Public
Domain Pictures. Used with permission.
2 comments:
What does it mean to be made in the image of God. Setting aside all the historical theological answers and just answering in context of Gen 1 and 2 ... one of the answers is work.
"McDonaldization" ? Oh that's good. Not everything needs to be efficient! Not everything needs to be maximum value or productive.
I didnt know the story of Adam Smith. And reading his words are actually kind of sad. Who really wants a world like that?
Post a Comment